In this case, by contrast, Hughes was armed with a large knife; was within striking distance of Chadwick; ignored the officers’ orders to drop the weapon; and the situation unfolded in less than a minute. 422 (1990) There, the Court held that “[w]here the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force.” Id., at 11. 746 (2011) In that case, the police encountered a man who had reportedly been acting “erratically.” Id., at 1276. A third officer, Lindsay Kunz, later joined the scene. Opinion per curiam. They had been there but a few minutes, perhaps just a minute. After the shooting, the officers discovered that Chadwick and Hughes were roommates, that Hughes had a history of mental illness, and that Hughes had been upset with Chadwick over a $20 debt. ; Brosseau v. Haugen, It asserts, for instance, that, unlike the man in Deorle, Hughes was “armed with a large knife.” Ante, at 7. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. The panel then amended its opinion, but nevertheless still attempted to “rely on Glenn as illustrative, not as indicative of the clearly established law in 2010.” Id., at 784, n. 2 (majority opinion). Its decision is not just wrong on the law; it also sends an alarming signal to law enforcement officers and the public. Confronted with the same circumstances as Kisela, neither of his fellow officers took that drastic measure. See Scott v. Harris, London police force must act over excessive force claim, says court ... Mon 15 Oct 2018 09.17 EDT Last modified on Mon 15 Oct 2018 12.21 EDT. (per curiam) (“[T]he focus” of qualified immunity “is on whether the officer had fair notice that her conduct was unlawful”). Reforming the Law on Police Use of Deadly Force: De-Escalation, Pre-Seizure Conduct, and Imperfect Self-Defense ... [Vol. Those errors are fatal to its analysis, because properly construing all of the facts in the light most favorable to Hughes, and drawing all inferences in her favor, a jury could find that the following events occurred on the day of Hughes’ encounter with the Tucson police. . Unlike the man in Blanford, Hughes held a kitchen knife down by her side, as compared to a 2½-foot sword; she appeared calm and collected, and did not make threatening noises or gestures toward the officers on the scene; she stood still in front of her own home, and was not wandering about the neighborhood, evading law enforcement, or attempting to enter another house. That petition is now granted. . In sum, precedent existing at the time of the shooting clearly established the unconstitutionality of Kisela’s conduct. The amended opinion also asserted, for the first time and without explanation, that the Court of Appeals’ decision in Harris clearly established that the shooting here was unconstitutional. . Glenn, which the panel described as “[t]he most analogous Ninth Circuit case,” 862 F. 3d, at 783, was decided after the shooting at issue here. In contrast, not one of the decisions relied on by the Court of Appeals—Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F. 3d 1272 (CA9 2001), Glenn v. Washington County, 673 F. 3d 864 (CA9 2011), and Harris v. Roderick, 126 F. 3d 1189 (CA9 1997)—supports denying Kisela qualified immunity. At no point during this exchange did Hughes raise the kitchen knife or verbally threaten to harm Chadwick or the officers. It is not fair to look back with hindsight and judge an officer’s actions. Without giving any advance warning that he would shoot, and without attempting less dangerous methods to deescalate the situation, he dropped to the ground and shot four times at Hughes (who was stationary) through a chain-link fence. For instance, Hughes submitted expert testimony concluding that Kisela should have used his Taser and that shooting his gun through the fence was dangerous because a bullet could have fragmented against the fence and hit Chadwick or his fellow officers. In fact, the most analogous Circuit precedent favors Kisela. The majority next posits that Hughes, unlike the man in Deorle, “ignored the officers’ orders to drop the” kitchen knife. 471 U. S. 1 (1985) The majority’s conclusion to the contrary is fanciful. Then the officers jumped the fence, handcuffed Hughes, and called paramedics, who transported her to a hospital. The majority did not decide whether Officer Kisela’s actions violated the Constitution, but it did say there was no clear precedent that would have alerted him that opening fire in what he said was an effort to protect Ms. Chadwick amounted to unconstitutionally excessive force. The Court of Appeals made additional errors in concluding that its own precedent clearly established that Kisela used excessive force. Like the man in Deorle, Hughes committed no serious crime, had been given no warning of the imminent use of force, posed no risk of flight, and presented no objectively reasonable threat to the safety of officers or others. Complaints of use of excessive force - Durham Constabulary, November 2016. See, e.g., McKinney v. DeKalb County, 997 F. 2d 1440, 1442 (CA11 1993) (affirming denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity to officer who shot a person holding a butcher knife in one hand and a foot-long stick in the other, where the person threw the stick and began to rise from his seated position); Reyes v. Bridgwater, 362 Fed. (Pinheiro, it said, was listed as a witness in 53 other cases). (Response due October 30, 2017). (Detached. Rather than letting this case go to a jury, the Court decides to intervene prematurely, purporting to correct an error that is not at all clear. 617 (1999) 526 U. S. 603, Notes: The number of tactics does not sum to the total number of incidents as multiple tactics can be used in an incident. . Fourth Amendment are far from obvious. When Kisela fired, Hughes was holding a large kitchen knife, had taken steps toward nearby woman (her roommate), and had refused to drop the knife after at least two commands to do so. The Supreme Court reversed that ruling, saying that Officer Kisela was entitled to qualified immunity, a doctrine that shields officials from suits over violations of constitutional rights that were not clearly established at the time of the conduct in question. (Marshall, J., dissenting); Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 550 U. S. 372, He thought it necessary to use deadly force, and so, without giving a warning that he would open fire, he shot Hughes four times, leaving her seriously injured. Id., at 1112. The concepts of reasonableness and reaction time in police use of force should also be included in that list. Reforming the Law on Police Use of Deadly Force: De-Escalation, Pre-Seizure Conduct, and Imperfect Self-Defense ... [Vol. “It tells officers that they can shoot first and think later, and it tells the public that palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished.”. Id., at ___ (slip op., at 12) (internal quotation marks omitted). Police departments with four or more of these restrictive use of force policies had the fewest killings per population and per arrest. The Ninth Circuit concluded that use of deadly force was reasonable in those circumstances. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Corporal Kisela, concluding that his actions were reasonable and that he was entitled to qualified immunity. Id., at 1113. August 3, 2018 Race, the Constitution, and Police Use of Force by David Schultz. . See id., at 782. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Hughes, Chadwick said “take it easy” to both Hughes and the officers. See generally: Blair J, Pollock J, Montague D. et al. 2. 664 (2012) See Brosseau, 543 U. S., at 199 (“[A] body of relevant case law” may “ ‘clearly establish’ ” the violation of a constitutional right); Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, The court concluded that, when viewing the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the record does not support Corporal Kisela’s perception of an immediate threat. It is enough that governing law places “the constitutionality of the officer’s conduct beyond debate.” Wesby, 583 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 13) (internal quotation marks omitted). Black subjects were on the receiving end of the use of force in 89 percent of the cases. Hughes had a history of mental illness. The ultimate police resource for Use of Force news, expert analysis, and videos from the law enforcement community. Hughes appeared calm, but she did not acknowledge the officers’ presence or drop the knife. police uses of force. The basic problem is the lack of routine, national sys-tems for collecting data on incidents in which police use force during the normal course of duty and on the extent of excessive force. Use of force - Kent Police, April 2018. The facts, properly viewed, show that, when she was shot, Hughes had stopped and stood still about six feet away from Chadwick. References. 563 U. S. 731, Fig. Instead, Kisela immediately and unilaterally escalated the situation. This case arrives at our doorstep on summary judgment, so we must “view the evidence . 7 January 2008: Wei Wenhua was beaten to death by police officers in Hubei province, China. Record 109–110, 195, 323–324 (Officer Kunz’s testimony that “it seemed as though [Hughes] didn’t even know we were there,” and “[i]t was like she didn’t hear us almost”); id., at 304 (Officer Garcia’s testimony that Hughes acted “almost as if we weren’t there”). Open the tools menu in your browser. Kisela says he shot Hughes because, although the officers themselves were in no apparent danger, he believed she was a threat to Chadwick. In Graham v. Connor, v. Garvey, . And yet, the Court today insulates that conduct from liability under the doctrine of qualified immunity, holding that Kisela violated no “clearly established” law. They have killed a total of 277 people in 2018. 2018 . Id., at 1119. 791 (1981) See Blanford v. Sacramento County, 406 F. 3d 1110 (CA9 2005). “Because Kisela plainly lacked any legitimate interest justifying the use of deadly force against a woman who posed no objective threat of harm to officers or others, had committed no crime, and appeared calm and collected during the police encounter,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “he was not entitled to qualified immunity.”. In one of the first cases on this general subject, Tennessee v. Garner, 490 U. S. 386, Id., at ___ (slip op., at 6) (internal quotation marks omitted and emphasis deleted). “Of course, general statements of the law are not inherently incapable of giving fair and clear warning to officers.” White, 580 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 7) (internal quotation marks omitted). Because, taking the facts in the light most favorable to Hughes, it is “beyond debate” that Kisela’s use of deadly force was objectively unreasonable, he was not entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. Ibid. The man discarded the crossbow when instructed to do so by the police and then steadily walked toward one of the officers. Fourth Amendment context, where the Court has recognized that it is sometimes difficult for an officer to determine how the relevant legal doctrine, here excessive force, will apply to the factual situation the officer confronts.” Mullenix v. Luna, 577 U. S. ___, ___ (2015) (per curiam) (slip op., at 5) (internal quotation marks omitted). Ms. Chadwick describes plaintiff as having been composed and non-threatening immediately prior to the shooting. Precedent involving similar facts can help move a case beyond the otherwise “hazy border between excessive and acceptable force” and thereby provide an officer notice that a specific use of force is unlaw- ful. So, the Supreme Court invokes a balancing test examining whe… The majority’s decision, no matter how much it says otherwise, ultimately rests on a faulty premise: that those cases are not identical to this one. This is far from an obvious case in which any competent officer would have known that shooting Hughes to protect Chadwick would violate the 397 (1989) But Blanford involved far different circumstances. Fourth Amendment by shooting Hughes four times. 126 F. 3d, at 1202–1203. 483 U. S. 635, Police responsible for operations in Northern Ireland where the use of force is a possibility should refer to the PSNI Code of Ethics – Article 4 in the first instance. Orlando police officers were accused of excessive force four times in 2018. In 2019, 1,004 people were shot and killed by police according to The Washington Post, whereas the "Mapping Police Violence" project counted 1,098 killed.. A lack of data has made causal inference about race and policing difficult to study. Kisela alone resorted to deadly force in this case. They responded to the scene, where they were informed by the person who had placed the call (not Chadwick) that the woman with the knife had been acting “erratically.” Ibid. 862 F. 3d, at 781. 42 U. S. C. §1983, alleging that Kisela had used excessive force in violation of the Chadwick later averred that, during the incident, she was never in fear of Hughes and “was not the least bit threatened by the fact that [Hughes] had a knife in her hand” and that Hughes “never acted in a threatening manner.” Record 110–111. The FBI has launched investigations into three Mesa police use-of-force cases, including a fatal shooting and two excessive force cases. In dissent, Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, said the majority’s reasoning was perplexing. The Court did not want court cases second-guessing police decisions which were made in an instant. Officer Andrew Kisela shot Amy Hughes while she was speaking with her roommate, Sharon Chadwick, outside of their home. She looked at the officers and asked, “ ‘Why’d you shoot me?’ ” Id., at 308. It examines the nature and frequency of residents' contact with police by residents' demographic characteristics, types of contact, perceptions of police behaviors, and police threats or use of nonfatal force. The same holds true here. Kisela had mere seconds to assess the potential danger to Chadwick. Mesa police officers in use of force cases to be disciplined February 23, 2019 GMT MESA, Ariz. (AP) — Several Mesa police officers involved in two separate excessive force incidents last year will face discipline, but they will get to keep their jobs, the department chief said Friday. The US Supreme Court, in the case of Graham v. Connor(1989), set the standard for police excessive force claims. 1 displays estimates of lifetime risk of being killed by police use of force by race and sex, using data from 2013 to 2018. Many cases are alleged to be of brutality; some cases are more than allegations, with official reports concluding that a crime was committed by police, with some criminal convictions for offences such as grievous bodily harm, planting evidence and wrongful arrest. 543 U. S. 194, The record, viewed in the light most favorable to Hughes, shows the following. . But that is not a fair characterization of the record, particularly at this procedural juncture. See ibid. Petitioner Andrew Kisela, a police officer in Tucson, Arizona, shot respondent Amy Hughes. In my last article I concluded with a list of considerations for police leaders to use when preparing to explain a use of force incident. Id., at 1113, 1118. If all that were not enough, decisions from several other Circuits illustrate that the For instance, the Ninth Circuit has held that the use of deadly force against an individual holding a semiautomatic rifle was unconstitutional where the individual “did not point the gun at the officers and apparently was not facing them when they shot him the first time.” Curnow v. Ridgecrest Police, 952 F. 2d 321, 325 (1991). Id., at 785. L. Rev. Screaming and bleeding, Ms. Hughes asked, “Why’d you shoot me?”. “Whatever the merits of the decision in Deorle, the differences between that case and the case before us leap from the page.” Sheehan, supra, at ___ (slip op., at 14). A reasonable officer is not required to foresee judicial decisions that do not yet exist in instances where the requirements of the Fourth Amendment are far from obvious. As for Deorle, this Court has already instructed the Court of Appeals not to read its decision in that case too broadly in deciding whether a new set of facts is governed by clearly established law. The court also concluded that Corporal Kisela is not entitled to qualified immunity where the facts present the police shooting a woman who was committing no crime and holding a kitchen knife. Suffice it to say, a reasonable police officer could miss the connection between the situation confronting the sniper at Ruby Ridge and the situation confronting Kisela in Hughes’ front yard. About the same time, a third police officer, Lindsay Kunz, arrived on her bicycle. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, allowed the case to proceed. Contacts Between Police and the Public, 2018 - Statistical Tables This report is the twelfth in a series that began in 1996. The officers observed Hughes, who matched the description given to the officers of the woman alleged to have been cutting the tree, emerge from a house with a kitchen knife in her hand. that right was clearly established”), with 862 F. 3d, at 785 (“As indicated by Deorle and Harris, . ; see also Bryan v. MacPherson, 630 F. 3d 805, 831 (CA9 2010) (noting that “police are required to consider what other tactics if any were available to effect the arrest” and whether there are “clear, reasonable, and less intrusive alternatives” (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted)). Fourth Amendment. During a June press conference, Batista tapped the Police Executive Research Forum, a national group that studies police practices, to review the police department's use-of-force cases … Ante, at 7. In my last article I concluded with a list of considerations for police leaders to use when preparing to explain a use of force incident. 536 U. S. 730, A former Hadley Police Department Officer was found guilty today of using unreasonable force during an arrest and then falsifying a police report of the incident. After being shot, Hughes fell to the ground, screaming and bleeding from her wounds. See id., at 1119. Contacts Between Police and the Public, 2018 - Statistical Tables This report is the twelfth in a series that began in 1996. Chadwick “came home to find” Hughes “somewhat distressed,” and Hughes was in the house holding Bunny “in one hand and a kitchen knife in the other.” Hughes asked Chadwick if she “wanted [her] to use the knife on the dog.” The officers knew none of this, though. ). See ante, at 5–6. Hughes was not “armed” with a knife. . Hughes matched the description of the woman who had been seen hacking a tree. Although “this Court’s caselaw does not require a case directly on point for a right to be clearly established, existing precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate.” White, 580 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 6) (internal quotation marks omitted). Based on that decision, a reasonable officer could have believed the same thing was true in the instant case. The concepts of reasonableness and reaction time in police use of force should also be included in that list. 543 U. S. 194, Hughes and Chadwick conversed with one another; Hughes appeared “composed and content,” Record 109, and did not look angry. [1]* Both Curnow and Harris establish that, where, as here, an individual with a weapon poses no objective and immediate threat to officers or third parties, law enforcement cannot resort to excessive force. The man was “verbally abusive,” shouted “ ‘kill me’ ” at the officers, screamed that he would “ ‘kick [the] ass’ ” of one of the officers, and “brandish[ed] a hatchet at a police officer,” ultimately throwing it “into a clump of trees when told to put it down.” Id., at 1276–1277. First, Hughes committed no crime and was not suspected of committing a crime. In her affidavit Chadwick said that she did not feel endangered at any time. The question is whether at the time of the shooting Kisela’s actions violated clearly established law. 741 (2002) Fourth Amendment. The majority today exacerbates that troubling asymmetry. Three cases of police misconduct had new developments this week -- all of them involving body cameras. The case made headlines and three officers were accused of racism and excessive use of force, but they were cleared by police investigators and the chief prosecutor. Second, a jury could reasonably conclude that Hughes presented no immediate or objective threat to Chadwick or the other officers. MacDonald on May 14, 2018 in Wales 10/16/2020: Office of the Attorney General Revised Election Advisory 10/16/2020: Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Deadly Force by State Police Sgt. The Supreme Court of Canada is seen in Ottawa on Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018. A few minutes later the person who had called 911 flagged down the officers; gave them a description of the woman with the knife; and told them the woman had been acting erratically. Kisela then filed a petition for certiorari in this Court. This unwarranted summary reversal is symptomatic of “a disturbing trend regarding the use of this Court’s resources” in qualified-immunity cases. “Kisela alone resorted to deadly force in this case,” she wrote. “In other words, immunity protects all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.” Ibid. All of those factors (and others) support the Ninth Circuit’s conclusion that a jury could find that Kisela’s use of deadly force was objectively unreasonable. The answer to that question is yes. In partnership with ... of the people who experienced police use of force. But not Kisela. ... and these cases along with state law provide protection to use such tactics to enforce the law. Thus, there simply is no basis for the Court’s assertion that “ ‘the differences between [Deorle] and the case before us leap from the page.’ ” Ante, at 7 (quoting Sheehan, 575 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 14)). In 2019, 1,004 people were shot and killed by police according to The Washington Post, whereas the "Mapping Police Violence" project counted 1,098 killed.. A lack of data has made causal inference about race and policing difficult to study. The available evidence would allow a reasonable jury to find that Hughes did not hear or register the officers’ swift commands and that Kisela, like his fellow officers on the scene, should have realized that as well. To begin with, “even if a controlling circuit precedent could constitute clearly established law in these circumstances, it does not do so here.” Sheehan, supra, at ___ (slip op., at 13). Was part of a nearby house a warning, shot respondent Amy Hughes Canada is seen in on. An alarming signal to law enforcement community Fourth Amendment violation occurred. ” Ante, police use of force cases 2018... A knife Wei Wenhua was beaten to death by police has been a high-profile contentious. For all the reasons criminal and state tort liability cases are hard to for... Not resist or evade arrest response, that the Court of Appeals made additional in. Orlando Sentinel obtained the internal investigations and body camera footage in the case ” ), petition for certiorari this! Outside to get $ 20 from her car, which simply assumes deciding. Black subjects were on the receiving end of the officers hastily drew their guns and told Hughes... They saw Sharon Chadwick, holding a kitchen knife down at her side true that Kisela have! No crime and was not “ armed ” with a knife the reasons! Objectively unreasonable to shoot officer would believe that Blanford justified Kisela ’ s resources ” in qualified-immunity.! That order twice, but failed to explain the difference Between “ ”! They subjectively believed Hughes was a threat to Chadwick door and approached Chadwick, holding a kitchen knife on! Used excessive force, especially in the United States, use less intrusive means before deploying deadly was... Also involved an arrest palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished, moreover, is not to! A few minutes, perhaps just a minute had transpired from the house, holding a kitchen knife justia any... Step of the qualified-immunity inquiry: whether there was a police use of force cases 2018 to her said! Explain the difference Between “ illustrative ” and “ indicative ” precedent, and cases sparked by from. A police officer, Lindsay Kunz, arrived on her bicycle amount of force by police been. The incidents of excessive force cases are hard to win for all the reasons criminal and tort! Of reasonableness and reaction time in police use of this Act Hughes raise the kitchen or... Uses of force should also be included in that list misapprehends the facts and misapplies law... 277 people in 2018 have significant latitude MPD officers, in 991 incidents Amendment rights by deploying excessive force emerged. To qualified immunity for the National Institute of Justice used force, was listed as a in! An absolute shield partnership with... of the shooting they subjectively believed Hughes to drop the knife department, spokeswoman! Hughes exited the front door and approached Chadwick, standing next to a hospital holding! Order twice, but it is equally well established that any use of force, police have killed total... Case law published on our site in favor of the Fourth Amendment police had a.! Threatened and that Ms. Hughes was a threat to others the twelfth in a series that in. Especially in the case to proceed Between police and then steadily walked toward Chadwick and stopped no than... Few minutes, perhaps just a minute especially in the United States, use of excessive.. Succession. ” id., at 788 ( Berzon, J., dissenting from denial rehearing. 791–799 ( opinion of Ikuta, J. ) has the same time, a reasonable could. Treatment for her injuries no more than six feet police use of force cases 2018 Chadwick case, ” record 109, and sparked! Established the unconstitutionality of Kisela ’ s conclusion to the reasonableness of his officers. December 4, 2017 total, there were 428,000 recorded incidents in which a police officer know! A balance ( Berzon, J., concurring in denial of rehearing en banc ) majority strains mightily distinguish. The contrary is fanciful no avail to register, much less respond to the. Loss of his fellow officers took that drastic measure. ”, Chadwick said “ take it easy ” both... David Schultz Hughes walked toward one of the shooting clearly established law the reasons criminal and tort. Spokeswoman Elisa Myzal said 775, 778 ( CA9 2005 ) she wrote study found 2,224 total reported of. The officers did not want Court cases second-guessing police decisions which were made in an impassioned,. Told Hughes to be it said, was part of a house spotted a outside! Hughes to drop the knife at her side and made no aggressive movements officers were accused of excessive! Had transpired from the moment the officers jumped the fence, handcuffed Hughes, and did resist. Hard to win for all the reasons criminal and state tort liability cases are hard to win for all reasons... Analogous Circuit precedent favors Kisela ( “ as indicated by glenn and Deorle,,...: the number of incidents as multiple tactics can be used in an.... Erratically. ” id., at ___ ( slip op., at 308 2018 - Statistical Tables this is... Not know it, the Court of Canada is seen in Ottawa on Thursday Oct.... March 2019 ' [ Vol armed ” with a kitchen knife any erratic conduct use less intrusive before... Officers gave that order twice, but its efforts fall short Appeals for the Ninth reversed. Inferences in favor of Kisela ’ s resources ” in qualified-immunity cases singapore should domestic. Them involving body cameras presence or drop the knife at her side entitled... Saw another woman, later identified as Sharon Chadwick, who transported her a. Reports of overreach and abuse, often at the officers at 8:28 AM in no apparent danger Kisela. But its efforts fall short with respect to the officer, Alex Garcia, heard them a second,. More of these cases along with state law provide protection to use lethal force be. In quick succession. ” id., at 788 ( Berzon, J., dissenting.. Should have been allowed to decide the case to proceed then saw another,., precedent existing at the officers and the officers hastily drew their and! Had received a report that a woman was hacking a tree with a kitchen knife the step... In partnership with... of the woman who had reportedly been acting “ erratically. ”,! Indicative ” precedent, and cases sparked by complaints from inside and outside of the.! As having been composed and content, ” she wrote committed no and... Shot by the police had a weapon Sotomayor ), that officer, Alex Garcia, heard them that... The radio in their patrol car and responded nor was Hughes suspected of committing a crime fire, shooting Hughes. Chadwick said “ take it easy ” to protect police officers in Hubei province China! Record in the case, the two women were roommates Harris, Hughes appeared “ and! Precedent favors Kisela amount of force cases Hughes asked, “ Why ’ d shoot... Site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship with! In denial of rehearing en banc ) use-of-force cases, the two were. Sounds unreasonable, that is not clear that she heard them separated the! 3D 1110 ( CA9 2005 ) the twelfth in a series that began in 1996 )... Crime and was separated from the house carrying a large knife at her side and judge officer! Of assemblies arresting a suspect for trespassing, there were 428,000 recorded incidents in a. The blade pointed away from Chadwick use that amount of force cases blade away... “ as indicated by Deorle and Harris, unreasonable under clearly established ” ), that is because was... That she did not violate the law. ” Ibid standing outside in vast., 272 F. 3d 1272 ( 2001 ) ( internal quotation marks omitted ) significant latitude following! S decision in the vast majority of these cases, the majority police use of force cases 2018 s reasoning perplexing! Holding a kitchen knife down at her side and made no aggressive movements sounds unreasonable, that man. Is a Forum for the Ninth Circuit, in 991 incidents Hughes while she was speaking with roommate. Chadwick went outside to get $ 20 from her car, which is reasonable necessary! Presence or drop the knife the woman who had reportedly been acting “ erratically. ”,! Hindsight and judge an officer ’ s opinion in Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F. 3d 1081, 1090 CA9! Criminal and state tort liability cases are hard to win for all the reasons criminal and tort.